Welcome
I hope you'll find something here that provokes some thought. If so, feel free to join the discussion. (If you're new to this blog, please check out Contentious Christians: How should we handle controversy? before posting comments. Thanks.)-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Categories
Archives
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Blogroll
- Better Bibles Blog
- Between Two Worlds
- Bock's Blog
- Christianity Today liveblog
- Daniel B. Wallace
- DeYoung, Restless, and Reformed
- Ed Stetzer
- Jesus Creed
- Koinonia
- Leading From the Sandbox
- Mondays with Mounce
- Olive Tree Bible Software
- Out of Ur
- Parchment & Pen
- Paul Copan
- Reasonable Faith
- Society of Evangelical Arminians
- Stand to Reason
- The Bible and Culture
- The Gospel Coalition
- The Rineholts' Mission
- This Lamp
Meta
Category Archives: historical Jesus
What good is a dead Messiah?
How the first century Jews understood the Messiah and resurrection When we consider the resurrection of Jesus, usually two competing viewpoints come immediately to mind: either Jesus rose from the dead, or he did not. That makes sense. But there’s … Continue reading
Posted in cultural interaction, historical Jesus, theology
Tagged appearances, bodily, crucifixion, Deliverer, historical context, Messiah, physical, resurrection, spiritual
2 Comments
What can we know about the historical Jesus?
We’ve learned in previous posts which gospels we can trust as generally reliable historical sources, and why. So, now, what do we really know about Jesus? Let’s see what we can discover about this historical figure. Miracle worker The New … Continue reading
How reliable are the New Testament gospels?
Let’s recap what we’ve learned so far [see below for links to previous posts]: We’ve verified that Jesus was a real, historical person. We’ve seen that the story of Jesus was unique and not copied from existing religions. We’ve discovered … Continue reading
Why did the early Christians reject the “alternative gospels”?
If you read our last post, you saw why the early Christians accepted the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John as authentic. But we also hear people talk about the “Gospel of Thomas,” the “Gospel of Peter,” and the … Continue reading
Why did the early Christians accept the New Testament gospels?
As promised, this week we begin looking at our historical sources for the life and teachings of Jesus. Which ones do we trust, and which ones should we reject? To help us understand why followers of Christ refused to accept … Continue reading
Was the story of Christ copied from other religions?
In our search for the historical Jesus, we’re first examining the most broad challenges of the critics. These claims—if true—would be devastating to the biblical Christian faith, and so we want to consider them carefully. Last week, we saw strong … Continue reading
Did Jesus really exist?
Was Jesus Christ a real, historical person? Did he actually exist? We begin with the most broad of questions regarding Jesus, and it’s one that we need to answer. If the answer is no, then the implications are clear. If … Continue reading
Posted in cultural interaction, historical Jesus
Tagged apologetics, Babylonian Talmud, ben Pandera, Celsus, historicity of Jesus, Josephus, Nero, Origen, Peregrinus, Tacitus
1 Comment